← Back to context

Comment by jjcm

18 hours ago

I read the entire thing fwiw (pseudo-retired life helps with time here).

It looks like it was a collaborative effort across multiple teams, where each team (research, security, psycology, etc etc etc) were all submitting ~10 pages or so. It doesn't feel like slop.

Did anything stand out across those 244 pages? Perhaps you have some of your take away thoughts written up somewhere?