Comment by willamhou

One thing I keep thinking about with AI security is that most of the focus is on model behavior — alignment, jailbreaks, guardrails. But once agents start calling tools, the attack surface shifts to the execution boundary. A request can be replayed, tampered with, or sent to the wrong target, and the server often has no way to distinguish that from a legitimate call.

Cryptographic attestation at the tool-call level (sign the request, verify before execution) would close a gap that behavioral controls alone can't cover. Curious whether Glasswing's threat model includes the agent-to-tool boundary or focuses primarily on the model layer.