← Back to context Comment by helo4362 7 hours ago Where is the source . This is just some random text 2 comments helo4362 Reply patates 7 hours ago The text is from Wikipedia, which summarizes the ideas from the book, both of which have been linked/referenced in the comment already.Comments on the Israel situation are my thoughts.Is there anything else I missed? tfrrggh 4 hours ago Israel is simply protecting itself and the attack is retaliation to the islamic religious terrorism.How is this book supports any thing even remotely in either favor.If anything , this applies more to religious terrorists ie. Hamas.Not to a national democratic state
patates 7 hours ago The text is from Wikipedia, which summarizes the ideas from the book, both of which have been linked/referenced in the comment already.Comments on the Israel situation are my thoughts.Is there anything else I missed? tfrrggh 4 hours ago Israel is simply protecting itself and the attack is retaliation to the islamic religious terrorism.How is this book supports any thing even remotely in either favor.If anything , this applies more to religious terrorists ie. Hamas.Not to a national democratic state
tfrrggh 4 hours ago Israel is simply protecting itself and the attack is retaliation to the islamic religious terrorism.How is this book supports any thing even remotely in either favor.If anything , this applies more to religious terrorists ie. Hamas.Not to a national democratic state
The text is from Wikipedia, which summarizes the ideas from the book, both of which have been linked/referenced in the comment already.
Comments on the Israel situation are my thoughts.
Is there anything else I missed?
Israel is simply protecting itself and the attack is retaliation to the islamic religious terrorism.
How is this book supports any thing even remotely in either favor.
If anything , this applies more to religious terrorists ie. Hamas.
Not to a national democratic state