Vinyl Cache and Varnish Cache

6 days ago (vinyl-cache.org)

This is the first I've actually heard of the name change... I used to use Varnish quite a bit, and had a decent grasp of VCL, for Drupal deployments. But I think Varnish 6 or 7 was when I started dropping off managing the caching layer as almost every project chose to offload caching to Cloudflare.

This is helpful, but it is yet to be seen how downstream picks it up. Wikidata[0] has renamed it and marked the Vinyl repo as the preferred one. Gentoo[1] renamed the package and switched to Vinyl. Homebrew[2] is now tracking Varnish Software (downstream of Vinyl). Fedora[3] has switched to Varnish Software as well. At endoflife.date[5], we renamed to vinyl and switched tracking as well. Wikipedia[6] has renamed Varnish (Software) -> Vinyl Cache.

[0]: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1602447

[1]: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=679937b...

[2]: https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/pull/273280

[3]: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/varnish/c/59f403810b746e0...

[4]: https://repology.org/project/varnish/packages

[5]: https://github.com/endoflife-date/endoflife.date/pull/9792

[6]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vinyl_Cache

Did not know this had happened, but does seem PHK (the original author of Varnish) is now with of the Vinyl Cache project, so this is not just a typical fork.

What's the deal with Antirez and PHK refusing to add TLS support?

  • Varnish Enterprise has https support.

    • the whole point of varnish software keeping a public version of "vinyl cache" as "varnish cache" with TLS is to give people a way to access a FOSS version with native TLS.

      I think TLS is table-stakes now, and has been for the last 10 years, at least.

      16 replies →