← Back to context Comment by anematode 4 hours ago Dear lord. It's actually laggy for me to scroll on that page. 4 comments anematode Reply hazelnut 4 hours ago same here and I'm using a beefy MacBook (Apple M4 Max, 64gb ram). something is wrong with the front end code. there are a lot of animations, so my hunch would be that something goes wrong there. anematode 3 hours ago Moore said computers get twice as fast every 18 months. Web devs took that as a challenge. OJFord 1 hour ago He said transistor count on chip doubles. (The more accurate pithy comment would be they took it as available resources.) 1 reply →
hazelnut 4 hours ago same here and I'm using a beefy MacBook (Apple M4 Max, 64gb ram). something is wrong with the front end code. there are a lot of animations, so my hunch would be that something goes wrong there. anematode 3 hours ago Moore said computers get twice as fast every 18 months. Web devs took that as a challenge. OJFord 1 hour ago He said transistor count on chip doubles. (The more accurate pithy comment would be they took it as available resources.) 1 reply →
anematode 3 hours ago Moore said computers get twice as fast every 18 months. Web devs took that as a challenge. OJFord 1 hour ago He said transistor count on chip doubles. (The more accurate pithy comment would be they took it as available resources.) 1 reply →
OJFord 1 hour ago He said transistor count on chip doubles. (The more accurate pithy comment would be they took it as available resources.) 1 reply →
same here and I'm using a beefy MacBook (Apple M4 Max, 64gb ram). something is wrong with the front end code. there are a lot of animations, so my hunch would be that something goes wrong there.
Moore said computers get twice as fast every 18 months. Web devs took that as a challenge.
He said transistor count on chip doubles. (The more accurate pithy comment would be they took it as available resources.)
1 reply →