← Back to context

Comment by phendrenad2

6 hours ago

If the only content of your post is sarcasm, please stick to Reddit. We like to stick to facts and reality here.

The sky is blue. See? I posted a fact. My comment is fully valid and you can't say anything about it. Oh? It's irrelevant to the topic?

It may be too subtle for you, but I was actually making the point that the surveillance panopticon theory was mostly triggered by the fact that Flock is cloud-based.

I'm basically making a distinction between a hypothetical non-cloud Flock vs cloud-Flock.

And it may be too complex a concept, but ex-lovers, union organizers, and journlists could use whatever camera-based ALPR existed, even if it wasn't cloud-based.

Making your comment irrelevant.

Thank you for it though.

My post contains only the thinnest crust of sarcasm, the rest is fact based content.

Ex lovers (using flock): https://www.kansas.com/news/politics-government/article29105...

Protestors (using flock): https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/11/how-cops-are-using-flo...

Union organizers (not using flock): https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/may/21/amaz...

https://fedscoop.com/social-media-ai-surveillance-unions-sta...

Journalists (not using flock): https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/source-leaked-documen...

Examples using flock are directly applicable, examples not using flock require a little bit of imagination to see that if they are not currently happening, they will be soon.

And a bonus i didn’t mention a woman leaving the state to obtain a legal abortion: https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/crime/te...

Replying in a separate comment, since you seem to have responded to my reply by editing your comment.

If you can’t disagree without belittling, maybe stick to reddit?

Either way, a networked array of license plate readers is an issue because it’s low friction and easily abused, with little space for oversight. A non-networked setup? Yeah i’m ok with that. If the gov needs to physically go to each camera and load data off them? Sounds fine to me. But somehow i don’t think that’s what you are suggesting when you say “non-cloud”. Once it’s networked, it doesn’t really matter if the network is a “cloud” based one or not.

But also, most of my comment was actually directed at alex43578‘s remarks, not yours.