← Back to context

Comment by whalesalad

14 hours ago

the fact that this is a widely accepted/encouraged practice is genuinely unhinged

Why? Nothing wrong with running your network interface in a VM. There are reasons for doing so even if drivers aren't an issue. Qubes OS does this, for instance, for security reasons.

  • Windows also does. Almost everything is a VM in windows these days.

    It's just how things work these days. If you'd say "I run my VPN client in a docker container" it would raise a lot less eyebrows. Yet it's not very different, really.

    Though conceptually I'd frown at having to run Linux. I'd prefer upgrading the hardware to a supported chip.

  • no matter how it's implemented, it must not be a user-requiring (or even user-facing) task

    • Why not? FreeBSD has never been intended as a batteries included, everything "just works" out of the box OS. It's meant to have a bare minimum install and let the user choose how things are set up. You can disagree with that philosophy, but that's not an indictment of FreeBSD. Just go use something that aligns better with your preferences.