← Back to context Comment by rockemsockem 11 hours ago [flagged] 4 comments rockemsockem Reply ceejayoz 11 hours ago There are lots of similar examples.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/December_2022_Twitter_suspensi...https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1993828797066748081 rockemsockem 9 hours ago I was not dismissing the comment's claim, simply the poor evidence. Your evidence is far better. notahacker 11 hours ago Twitter's own first published transparency report under Musk acknowledged they suspended 3x as many accounts (for policy reasons other than spamming) in six months as they had done over an equivalent period just before he acquired it. rockemsockem 9 hours ago I was not dismissing the comment's claim, simply the poor evidence. This is better evidence, albeit uncited.
ceejayoz 11 hours ago There are lots of similar examples.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/December_2022_Twitter_suspensi...https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1993828797066748081 rockemsockem 9 hours ago I was not dismissing the comment's claim, simply the poor evidence. Your evidence is far better.
rockemsockem 9 hours ago I was not dismissing the comment's claim, simply the poor evidence. Your evidence is far better.
notahacker 11 hours ago Twitter's own first published transparency report under Musk acknowledged they suspended 3x as many accounts (for policy reasons other than spamming) in six months as they had done over an equivalent period just before he acquired it. rockemsockem 9 hours ago I was not dismissing the comment's claim, simply the poor evidence. This is better evidence, albeit uncited.
rockemsockem 9 hours ago I was not dismissing the comment's claim, simply the poor evidence. This is better evidence, albeit uncited.
There are lots of similar examples.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/December_2022_Twitter_suspensi...
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1993828797066748081
I was not dismissing the comment's claim, simply the poor evidence. Your evidence is far better.
Twitter's own first published transparency report under Musk acknowledged they suspended 3x as many accounts (for policy reasons other than spamming) in six months as they had done over an equivalent period just before he acquired it.
I was not dismissing the comment's claim, simply the poor evidence. This is better evidence, albeit uncited.