← Back to context Comment by hrimfaxi 9 hours ago Does it have to be either/or? 3 comments hrimfaxi Reply philistine 8 hours ago Volunteer your time to do a dual strategy with content that fits both. Comms takes time, the EFF is adapting its comm strategy. hrimfaxi 2 hours ago Pushing messages out to multiple platforms is a solved problem. Parent said> It's better to have a smaller core of highly engaged people than a mass of disengaged eyeballs glazing over.which to me, it's better to spew a message out into the ether with the chance that someone might happen upon it rather than close things off entirely.
philistine 8 hours ago Volunteer your time to do a dual strategy with content that fits both. Comms takes time, the EFF is adapting its comm strategy. hrimfaxi 2 hours ago Pushing messages out to multiple platforms is a solved problem. Parent said> It's better to have a smaller core of highly engaged people than a mass of disengaged eyeballs glazing over.which to me, it's better to spew a message out into the ether with the chance that someone might happen upon it rather than close things off entirely.
hrimfaxi 2 hours ago Pushing messages out to multiple platforms is a solved problem. Parent said> It's better to have a smaller core of highly engaged people than a mass of disengaged eyeballs glazing over.which to me, it's better to spew a message out into the ether with the chance that someone might happen upon it rather than close things off entirely.
Volunteer your time to do a dual strategy with content that fits both. Comms takes time, the EFF is adapting its comm strategy.
Pushing messages out to multiple platforms is a solved problem. Parent said
> It's better to have a smaller core of highly engaged people than a mass of disengaged eyeballs glazing over.
which to me, it's better to spew a message out into the ether with the chance that someone might happen upon it rather than close things off entirely.