Isn’t that their defense against responsibility for their customers’ content? Having some broad filtering for legal requirements or scams is one thing but if they’re doing this it seems like support for cases alleging that they have editorial control and therefore responsibility.
Isn’t that their defense against responsibility for their customers’ content? Having some broad filtering for legal requirements or scams is one thing but if they’re doing this it seems like support for cases alleging that they have editorial control and therefore responsibility.
> Did anyone ever accuse Meta of being an open platform though?
My memory says it was Meta who said that. Zuck himself....
I remember that but I was talking about anyone outside the company. I think many platforms call themselves open but most aren't really.