← Back to context Comment by ImPostingOnHN 13 hours ago "hostage speaks well of hostage-taker" 5 comments ImPostingOnHN Reply john_strinlai 13 hours ago if you think i am defending microsoft, your hatred has blinded you to what my comments are actually saying. ImPostingOnHN 13 hours ago Why would I think that? That isn't a sensible conclusion from what I posted. I think you replied to the wrong postRegardless of what the maintainer says of their abuser after being abused, the point I think you are getting stuck on is this:Creating a system which locks you out if you don't speak to a human isn't de-facto malicious.Having support where you can't speak to a human isn't de-facto malicious, either.Doing both at the same time, however, is de-facto malicious. Some executives likely got bonuses for doing it, too. john_strinlai 13 hours ago you said "hostage speaks well of hostage-taker" in response to my comment.i interpreted that as you saying i am the hostage of microsoft, and have stockholm syndrome, therefor am speaking well of (defending) microsoft.if i misinterpreted that, my bad. are you calling jason the hostage? 2 replies →
john_strinlai 13 hours ago if you think i am defending microsoft, your hatred has blinded you to what my comments are actually saying. ImPostingOnHN 13 hours ago Why would I think that? That isn't a sensible conclusion from what I posted. I think you replied to the wrong postRegardless of what the maintainer says of their abuser after being abused, the point I think you are getting stuck on is this:Creating a system which locks you out if you don't speak to a human isn't de-facto malicious.Having support where you can't speak to a human isn't de-facto malicious, either.Doing both at the same time, however, is de-facto malicious. Some executives likely got bonuses for doing it, too. john_strinlai 13 hours ago you said "hostage speaks well of hostage-taker" in response to my comment.i interpreted that as you saying i am the hostage of microsoft, and have stockholm syndrome, therefor am speaking well of (defending) microsoft.if i misinterpreted that, my bad. are you calling jason the hostage? 2 replies →
ImPostingOnHN 13 hours ago Why would I think that? That isn't a sensible conclusion from what I posted. I think you replied to the wrong postRegardless of what the maintainer says of their abuser after being abused, the point I think you are getting stuck on is this:Creating a system which locks you out if you don't speak to a human isn't de-facto malicious.Having support where you can't speak to a human isn't de-facto malicious, either.Doing both at the same time, however, is de-facto malicious. Some executives likely got bonuses for doing it, too. john_strinlai 13 hours ago you said "hostage speaks well of hostage-taker" in response to my comment.i interpreted that as you saying i am the hostage of microsoft, and have stockholm syndrome, therefor am speaking well of (defending) microsoft.if i misinterpreted that, my bad. are you calling jason the hostage? 2 replies →
john_strinlai 13 hours ago you said "hostage speaks well of hostage-taker" in response to my comment.i interpreted that as you saying i am the hostage of microsoft, and have stockholm syndrome, therefor am speaking well of (defending) microsoft.if i misinterpreted that, my bad. are you calling jason the hostage? 2 replies →
if you think i am defending microsoft, your hatred has blinded you to what my comments are actually saying.
Why would I think that? That isn't a sensible conclusion from what I posted. I think you replied to the wrong post
Regardless of what the maintainer says of their abuser after being abused, the point I think you are getting stuck on is this:
Creating a system which locks you out if you don't speak to a human isn't de-facto malicious.
Having support where you can't speak to a human isn't de-facto malicious, either.
Doing both at the same time, however, is de-facto malicious. Some executives likely got bonuses for doing it, too.
you said "hostage speaks well of hostage-taker" in response to my comment.
i interpreted that as you saying i am the hostage of microsoft, and have stockholm syndrome, therefor am speaking well of (defending) microsoft.
if i misinterpreted that, my bad. are you calling jason the hostage?
2 replies →