← Back to context Comment by WillAdams 7 hours ago Why use this rather than Maker.js?https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/garage/profiles/maker-js/ 2 comments WillAdams Reply astroalex 7 hours ago One obvious difference I can see at a glance is that Maker.js doesn't support 3D models, while FluidCAD does. I assume Maker.js is a lower level library aimed at interfacing directly with CNC machines, while FluidCAD is focused on 3D design. WillAdams 6 hours ago Maker.js is supposed to also support openjscad (or whatever they're call it these days, the JavaScript enabled version of OpenSCAD).
astroalex 7 hours ago One obvious difference I can see at a glance is that Maker.js doesn't support 3D models, while FluidCAD does. I assume Maker.js is a lower level library aimed at interfacing directly with CNC machines, while FluidCAD is focused on 3D design. WillAdams 6 hours ago Maker.js is supposed to also support openjscad (or whatever they're call it these days, the JavaScript enabled version of OpenSCAD).
WillAdams 6 hours ago Maker.js is supposed to also support openjscad (or whatever they're call it these days, the JavaScript enabled version of OpenSCAD).
One obvious difference I can see at a glance is that Maker.js doesn't support 3D models, while FluidCAD does. I assume Maker.js is a lower level library aimed at interfacing directly with CNC machines, while FluidCAD is focused on 3D design.
Maker.js is supposed to also support openjscad (or whatever they're call it these days, the JavaScript enabled version of OpenSCAD).