← Back to context

Comment by bit-anarchist

9 hours ago

That's a pretty strong statement. You know the saying: strong statements require equally strong evidence.

It's refuted by the Buddhist nationalists killing Rohingya Muslims. Not sure about the concept of evidence. For best epistemology you'd have to say "if this was false, we'd see evidence X, and we don't, or evidence Y, and we don't see that either, and nobody's thought of what evidence Z might be, so here we are, it seems true so far."