← Back to context Comment by slater- 6 days ago Turns out the article was not in fact incendiary. 5 comments slater- Reply stavros 6 days ago Yeah, it's one thing to write an incendiary article, it's a very different thing to write an objective article about someone who will say anything to get what they want. scruple 6 days ago Incendiary. Is he trying to suggest the journalists are at fault here? daseiner1 6 days ago "I am firm, you are obstinate, he is a pig-headed fool."https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Emotive_conjugation MiguelX413 5 days ago That's exactly what he's trying to do timmytokyo 5 days ago Yes.
stavros 6 days ago Yeah, it's one thing to write an incendiary article, it's a very different thing to write an objective article about someone who will say anything to get what they want.
scruple 6 days ago Incendiary. Is he trying to suggest the journalists are at fault here? daseiner1 6 days ago "I am firm, you are obstinate, he is a pig-headed fool."https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Emotive_conjugation MiguelX413 5 days ago That's exactly what he's trying to do timmytokyo 5 days ago Yes.
daseiner1 6 days ago "I am firm, you are obstinate, he is a pig-headed fool."https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Emotive_conjugation
Yeah, it's one thing to write an incendiary article, it's a very different thing to write an objective article about someone who will say anything to get what they want.
Incendiary. Is he trying to suggest the journalists are at fault here?
"I am firm, you are obstinate, he is a pig-headed fool."
https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Emotive_conjugation
That's exactly what he's trying to do
Yes.