Comment by johnfn

No one is saying your nested for loop idea because it won't actually work in practice. In short, the signal to noise ratio will be too high - you will need to comb through a ton of false positives in order to find anything valuable, at which point it stops looking like "automated security research" and it starts looking like "normal security research".

If you don't believe me, you should try it yourself, it's only a couple of dollars. Hey, maybe you're right, and you can prove us all wrong. But I'd bet you on great odds that you're not.