← Back to context

Comment by slopinthebag

2 hours ago

Mmm, Anthropic had a harness that had Mythos check each file as an entry point. That's not quite "here is a codebase, find vulns". A more sophisticated harness with a fast and cheap model could go function-by-function to do the same thing. Which is what this was validating.

> The research discussed here provided models with just a known buggy function, missing the whole process required to find that bug in the first place.

That process can be made part of a harness, again which is what they were validating.

I'm not sure why people are so hell-bent on disparaging open source models here. I get that some people cant get results from them, but that's just a skill issue - we should all be ecstatic that we don't need to rely on the unethical AI corps to allow us to do our jobs.