← Back to context

Comment by iLoveOncall

8 hours ago

Why are you comparing PostgreSQL to an in-memory SQLite instead of a file-based one? Wow, memory is faster than disk, who would have thought?

Because it doesn't make a difference, because `SELECT 1` doesn't need to touch the database:

    Running 100,000 `SELECT 1` queries:
    PostgreSQL (localhost): 2.71 seconds
    SQLite (in-memory): 0.07 seconds
    SQLite (tempfile): 0.07 seconds

(https://gist.github.com/leifkb/d8778422d450d9a3f103ed43258cc...)

  • > Because it doesn't make a difference, because `SELECT 1` doesn't need to touch the database:

    I hope you understand that your claim boils down to stating that SQLite is faster at doing nothing at all, which is a silly case to make.

    • The original claim being discussed is about the overhead of an in-process database vs. a database server in a separate process, not about whether SQLite or PostgreSQL have a faster database engine.