← Back to context

Comment by wewewedxfgdf

5 hours ago

If you are the CEO of Intel then posting from your personal account is the same thing - you are the CEO - it's not private.

This is just scratching the surface - his religious posts went on and on and on whilst he was Intel CEO.

https://gizmodo.com/things-are-so-bad-at-intel-that-the-boss...

https://www.indiatoday.in/technology/news/story/intel-facing...

https://www.reddit.com/r/intel/comments/1hb1imh/former_intel...

https://x.com/PGelsinger/status/1891069258953576711

https://x.com/dylan522p/status/1820503612591919375

https://x.com/dylan522p/status/1701081984943227367

https://x.com/PGelsinger/status/1820129317122080977

This looks like a motte-and-bailey. Your original comment, the bailey: "he posted much religious stuff from official Intel accounts". This comment, the motte: "he posted much religious stuff".

You could've just said, "I thought it was extremely strange that he posted so much religious stuff while CEO". That would've been a very defensible position. You didn't need the false part of posting from official Intel accounts.

Or, if it was an honest mistake, you should've written something along the lines of: "Sorry, I misremembered, it was his personal accounts. But when you're a CEO, I don't think the distinction matters much; anything you post will be read as 'Intel's CEO says'".