Comment by ryandrake
1 day ago
They don't even "lose a small amount of money." They simply gain less money than usual for a short period of time. Think of how rough that is for them.
1 day ago
They don't even "lose a small amount of money." They simply gain less money than usual for a short period of time. Think of how rough that is for them.
I think it's even that they "gain less money than they could if everyone watching illegally would pay for it when they could not watch illegally" (that's usually how companies crying "piracy" calculate "losses" — "let's assume everyone watching illegally would certainly still watch it and pay the full price").
I once remember reading an article about shareholders selling off a stock because the rate of increase in profit had slowed.
There is nothing wrong with that. Stock price is based on perceived future value , not current company profits.
This isn't quite right either. It's "they gain less money than they might potentially gain if piracy weren't physically possible". If the piracy avenues didn't exist, how many people would actually pay full price to the legitimate sources, and how many people would simply go without?
Arguably they even gain more money in the long run, because more people have access to their entertainment and they have more opportunities to form life long connections with consumers.