← Back to context Comment by selcuka 13 hours ago So, like brainf*ck (the esoteric programming language), but for maths? 7 comments selcuka Reply Lerc 12 hours ago But even tighter. With eml and 1 you could encode a funtion in rpn as bits.Although you also need to encode where to put the input.The real question is what emoji to use for eml when written out. vintermann 5 hours ago In rpn notation you just put the input on the stack, right? The encodings seems like they could get pretty big, and encodings certainly wouldn't be unique, but you should be able to encode pretty much any constant you could think of. zephen 12 hours ago > The real question is what emoji to use for eml when written out.Some Emil or another, I suppose. Maybe the one from Ratatouille, or maybe this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emil_i_L%C3%B6nneberga Charon77 12 hours ago Not brainf*ck. This is the SUBLEQ equivalent of math https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-instruction_set_computer#S... 1 reply → selcuka 12 hours ago So brainf*ck in binary?I'm kidding, of course. You can encode anything in bits this way. nostrademons 11 hours ago More like lambda calculus, but for continuous functions.
Lerc 12 hours ago But even tighter. With eml and 1 you could encode a funtion in rpn as bits.Although you also need to encode where to put the input.The real question is what emoji to use for eml when written out. vintermann 5 hours ago In rpn notation you just put the input on the stack, right? The encodings seems like they could get pretty big, and encodings certainly wouldn't be unique, but you should be able to encode pretty much any constant you could think of. zephen 12 hours ago > The real question is what emoji to use for eml when written out.Some Emil or another, I suppose. Maybe the one from Ratatouille, or maybe this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emil_i_L%C3%B6nneberga Charon77 12 hours ago Not brainf*ck. This is the SUBLEQ equivalent of math https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-instruction_set_computer#S... 1 reply → selcuka 12 hours ago So brainf*ck in binary?I'm kidding, of course. You can encode anything in bits this way.
vintermann 5 hours ago In rpn notation you just put the input on the stack, right? The encodings seems like they could get pretty big, and encodings certainly wouldn't be unique, but you should be able to encode pretty much any constant you could think of.
zephen 12 hours ago > The real question is what emoji to use for eml when written out.Some Emil or another, I suppose. Maybe the one from Ratatouille, or maybe this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emil_i_L%C3%B6nneberga Charon77 12 hours ago Not brainf*ck. This is the SUBLEQ equivalent of math https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-instruction_set_computer#S... 1 reply →
Charon77 12 hours ago Not brainf*ck. This is the SUBLEQ equivalent of math https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-instruction_set_computer#S... 1 reply →
selcuka 12 hours ago So brainf*ck in binary?I'm kidding, of course. You can encode anything in bits this way.
But even tighter. With eml and 1 you could encode a funtion in rpn as bits.
Although you also need to encode where to put the input.
The real question is what emoji to use for eml when written out.
In rpn notation you just put the input on the stack, right? The encodings seems like they could get pretty big, and encodings certainly wouldn't be unique, but you should be able to encode pretty much any constant you could think of.
> The real question is what emoji to use for eml when written out.
Some Emil or another, I suppose. Maybe the one from Ratatouille, or maybe this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emil_i_L%C3%B6nneberga
Not brainf*ck. This is the SUBLEQ equivalent of math https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-instruction_set_computer#S...
1 reply →
So brainf*ck in binary?
I'm kidding, of course. You can encode anything in bits this way.
More like lambda calculus, but for continuous functions.