Comment by rvz
13 hours ago
Apple never competed in the "AI race" in the first place, because they already knew they were already at the finish line.
This was really unsurprising [0].
13 hours ago
Apple never competed in the "AI race" in the first place, because they already knew they were already at the finish line.
This was really unsurprising [0].
Your linked comment argues the opposite.
> Won't be surprised for the re-introduction of Xserve again but for AI.
This means, Apple is gonna spend a lot of money standing up data centers (CapEx). And the article in question is essentially saying that Apple is smart not to spend any money.
It sounds like there's a bit of wishful thinking on - Whatever Apple is doing is 4D chess. Apple not spending any money - That's genuis. Apple re-introducing Xserve racks - genius.
> This is an obvious moat for Apple who can offer a cheaper alternative for training, inference AI server farms.
According to Bloomberg, Apple's inference server farms are a flop: https://9to5mac.com/2026/03/02/some-apple-ai-servers-are-rep...
Go a little bit deeper than what the media directly wants you to think.
By all means, enlighten me. What did I miss?
1 reply →