← Back to context Comment by java-man 3 days ago What could possiblye go wrong? 3 comments java-man Reply JumpCrisscross 3 days ago “…the F.A.A. determined that the risk would be minimal even if the laser came into contact with an airplane”I’m curious to know more about the testing. Was it only done on airliners, or GA aircraft, too? SilverElfin 3 days ago Is this an admission that the arrests and prosecutions of people with lasers were a farce? JumpCrisscross 2 days ago Probably not. The military is allowed to do lots of things civilians aren’t, in part because of the assurance of training.
JumpCrisscross 3 days ago “…the F.A.A. determined that the risk would be minimal even if the laser came into contact with an airplane”I’m curious to know more about the testing. Was it only done on airliners, or GA aircraft, too? SilverElfin 3 days ago Is this an admission that the arrests and prosecutions of people with lasers were a farce? JumpCrisscross 2 days ago Probably not. The military is allowed to do lots of things civilians aren’t, in part because of the assurance of training.
SilverElfin 3 days ago Is this an admission that the arrests and prosecutions of people with lasers were a farce? JumpCrisscross 2 days ago Probably not. The military is allowed to do lots of things civilians aren’t, in part because of the assurance of training.
JumpCrisscross 2 days ago Probably not. The military is allowed to do lots of things civilians aren’t, in part because of the assurance of training.
“…the F.A.A. determined that the risk would be minimal even if the laser came into contact with an airplane”
I’m curious to know more about the testing. Was it only done on airliners, or GA aircraft, too?
Is this an admission that the arrests and prosecutions of people with lasers were a farce?
Probably not. The military is allowed to do lots of things civilians aren’t, in part because of the assurance of training.