← Back to context

Comment by thornewolf

17 days ago

it's a security feature. otherwise my malicious site could check for cdn.sensitivephotoswebsite.com and blackmail you if it was cached already

It would be nice if there was a whitelist option for non-sensitive content. I stopped using cdn links due to the overhead of the extra domain lookups but I did think that my self hosted content would be cached across domains.

  • It would be nice if there was a whitelist option for non-sensitive content.

    There's no such thing as non-sensitive content from a CDN though. Scripts are obviously sensitive, styles can be used to exfiltrate data through background-url directives, and anything like images has no benefit being cached across sites.

    Fonts might be one exception, but I bet those are exploitable somehow.