Comment by loloquwowndueo
1 day ago
The actual app name would be good to have. Understandable they don’t want to throw them under the bus but it’s just delaying taking action by not revealing what app/service this was.
1 day ago
The actual app name would be good to have. Understandable they don’t want to throw them under the bus but it’s just delaying taking action by not revealing what app/service this was.
I was trying to look it up (basically https://developers.google.com/identity/protocols/oauth2/java... -- the consent screen shows the app name) but it now says "Error 401: invalid_client; The OAuth client was not found." so it was probably deleted by the oauth client owner.
It indeed was deleted as this URL shows: https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/v2/auth?client_id=11067...
Makes it even more relevant to have the actual app or vendor name - who’s to say they just removed it to save face and won’t add it later?
It’s context.ai
https://x.com/rauchg/status/2045995362499076169
[dead]