← Back to context

Comment by chasil

20 hours ago

The problem is high-quality hydrogen bromide, from the article.

"Critically, ICL’s hydrogen bromide gas production, including the semiconductor-grade output supplied to South Korean fabrication plants, is manufactured at the same Sodom facility where extraction occurs, meaning extraction and conversion infrastructure are co-located in the same vulnerable corridor."

The production facility is a real vulnerability but the shipping factor is overstated - total supply for silicone etching could be airlifted. It’ll be more expensive but not a crisis.

Making it isn’t hard. The issue is that it’s such a low margin product that anyone spinning up a facility will not see any decent ROI. And local govt won’t allow competition because it risks collapsing their whole market if both producers fail at a the same time.

This is what govt is good for, in respects to ensuring materials supply continuity for their domestic markets

  • The article says it would be difficult to ramp up other production. What is your claim based on?

    • As far as day-to-day production goes, it’s not a terribly complicated process. I’m not going to say it’s easy, but it’s not hard (in the grand scheme of this industry).

      Anyways, with that out of the way:

      Quote me where I talked about difficulty of bringup (layperson: “ramping up”) production.

      (I’m assuming that that is the “claim” that you think I made that you are referring to. If it’s not, please enlighten me.)

      Unless you can quote me, you’re just coming up with something in your head and arguing with me about it. In fact, in my post, I made some light allusions to the not-insubstantial cost of a bringup.

      3 replies →