← Back to context

Comment by nozzlegear

21 hours ago

> Makes me wondered if you've ever bought a bottle of alcohol before lol.

I'm a teetotaler so no, I literally have not. I was mostly thinking about cigarette and tobacco products which are the most glaring, obvious counterpoints. But you'll be happy to learn that virtually all vehicles in the US also come with operating manuals that profusely warn people not to breathe in the exhaust from the vehicle.

Don’t worry, every bottle in the US has the surgeon general’s warning on it and it doesn’t call out cancer, yet. Adding cancer to the ills of booze was proposed in 2025 so your intuition was correct, directionally.

On every bottle:

Alcoholic Beverage Labeling Act of 1988

“ GOVERNMENT WARNING: (1) According to the Surgeon General, women should not drink alcoholic beverages during pregnancy because of the risk of birth defects. (2) Consumption of alcoholic beverages impairs your ability to drive a car or operate machinery, and may cause health problems"

Cancer proposal: https://www.mdanderson.org/cancerwise/not-just-a-hangover--t...

https://www.ttb.gov/regulated-commodities/beverage-alcohol/d...

(As if adding this text will do anything other than reduce the companies liability, rofl)

  • Labeling is only one part of a larger strategy for population health initiatives. Warning the consumer is the absolute minimum responsible thing to do when the harmful effects are known.