← Back to context Comment by hollerith 16 hours ago No offense, but you don't get it. 7 comments hollerith Reply goodmythical 15 hours ago w3m, lynks, elinks? falkon?I'm not sure what you mean given that JS and CSS account for at least half of the kitchen sink.Hell, wasn't there someone that implemented an entire OS stack in CSS? colechristensen 14 hours ago My point is a new standard, document format, and browser that doesn't have the capabilities which limits publishers to ... not what we have now.The existence of elinks which is marginally useful on the modern web doesn't make the cut nor do tools to un-shitify the existing web. spankalee 11 hours ago What's the difference between that and a subset of what we have now, without, say WebUSB? 4 replies →
goodmythical 15 hours ago w3m, lynks, elinks? falkon?I'm not sure what you mean given that JS and CSS account for at least half of the kitchen sink.Hell, wasn't there someone that implemented an entire OS stack in CSS? colechristensen 14 hours ago My point is a new standard, document format, and browser that doesn't have the capabilities which limits publishers to ... not what we have now.The existence of elinks which is marginally useful on the modern web doesn't make the cut nor do tools to un-shitify the existing web. spankalee 11 hours ago What's the difference between that and a subset of what we have now, without, say WebUSB? 4 replies →
colechristensen 14 hours ago My point is a new standard, document format, and browser that doesn't have the capabilities which limits publishers to ... not what we have now.The existence of elinks which is marginally useful on the modern web doesn't make the cut nor do tools to un-shitify the existing web. spankalee 11 hours ago What's the difference between that and a subset of what we have now, without, say WebUSB? 4 replies →
spankalee 11 hours ago What's the difference between that and a subset of what we have now, without, say WebUSB? 4 replies →
w3m, lynks, elinks? falkon?
I'm not sure what you mean given that JS and CSS account for at least half of the kitchen sink.
Hell, wasn't there someone that implemented an entire OS stack in CSS?
My point is a new standard, document format, and browser that doesn't have the capabilities which limits publishers to ... not what we have now.
The existence of elinks which is marginally useful on the modern web doesn't make the cut nor do tools to un-shitify the existing web.
What's the difference between that and a subset of what we have now, without, say WebUSB?
4 replies →