← Back to context Comment by daneel_w 10 hours ago I wonder when the OpenSSH developers will change their stance on Ed448. 2 comments daneel_w Reply farfatched 9 hours ago I'm not familiar with their stance, but bear in mind the costs of introducing new key type on the ecosystem, and on maintenance of SSH implementations. daneel_w 8 hours ago Imagine if we would've had the same hesitant cost-first reasoning about Ed25519, and then again about ML-KEM and SNTRUP.
farfatched 9 hours ago I'm not familiar with their stance, but bear in mind the costs of introducing new key type on the ecosystem, and on maintenance of SSH implementations. daneel_w 8 hours ago Imagine if we would've had the same hesitant cost-first reasoning about Ed25519, and then again about ML-KEM and SNTRUP.
daneel_w 8 hours ago Imagine if we would've had the same hesitant cost-first reasoning about Ed25519, and then again about ML-KEM and SNTRUP.
I'm not familiar with their stance, but bear in mind the costs of introducing new key type on the ecosystem, and on maintenance of SSH implementations.
Imagine if we would've had the same hesitant cost-first reasoning about Ed25519, and then again about ML-KEM and SNTRUP.