← Back to context

Comment by alansaber

9 hours ago

I'm conceptually very bullish on B (entity resolution and hierarchy pre-processing during writes). I'm less certain than A and B need to be merged into a single library. Obviously, a search agent should know the properties of the KG being searched, but as the previous poster mentioned, these graph dbs are inherently inaccurate and only form part of the retrieval pattern anyway.

Maybe it's useful to split out B1) KG pipelines from the choice of B2) simple property graph ontologies & queries vs advanced rdf ontologies and sparql queries

It sounds like you are thinking about KG pipelines, but I'm unclear on whether typed property graphs, vs more advanced RDF/SPARQL, is needed in your view on the graph engine side?