Comment by moffkalast
8 hours ago
I presume it was due to the temperature gradient being extremely low, so they could gradually adapt to the change over hundreds of years. We're pulling the handbrake in geological terms.
(that chart was made in 2016, given that we were at +1.5C last year we're outdone even the most pessimistic scenario presented on that graph by quite a bit, the line is now almost horizontal)
How are you in any way qualified to know that what you said is correct, besides that being a wild guess?
How are you qualified to know anything that you haven't personally witnessed, besides all of your "knowledge" being a wild guess?
https://climate.copernicus.eu/copernicus-2024-first-year-exc...
Reading a thermometer is not really an advanced skill.
Except you have no idea what the capability of sharks are to adapt to different ocean temperatures. As sharks swim across various parts of the ocean or at various depths in a single day, the temperatures change far quicker than ocean temperatures over the last 100 years. The idea that you could guess that sharks can't adapt to a wide range of temperatures is nothing but a wild guess on your part because it agrees with your biased belief that sharks are in danger due to climate change.
But sharks have been around for 400 million years, longer than trees have existed. The amount of change they have endured is far greater than that, and sharks are likely the most adept at climate change.
1 reply →