Comment by throwatdem12311
11 hours ago
It’s total waste of time because both are going to be maintained in perpetuity. Increasing the maintenance burden and attack surface of git.
“a novice thinks”
Just learn your damn tools and stop whining.
11 hours ago
It’s total waste of time because both are going to be maintained in perpetuity. Increasing the maintenance burden and attack surface of git.
“a novice thinks”
Just learn your damn tools and stop whining.
The git-restore(1) implementation looks like about 35 lines of code. Then add a little more complexity for some apparent common functions that needed to be factored out.
For a dedicated "restore" it's worth it to me... (who will not maintain it)
At the hidden cost of educating millions of users how git actually operates once they can't restore a file
Neither of these two commands are any more really-operates than the other.
3 replies →