← Back to context Comment by wpm 2 days ago Cause X is a stupid name 2 comments wpm Reply cortesoft 2 days ago And twitter isn't? zaphar 2 days ago No, it isn't. Twitter was absolutely brilliant marketing. It perfectly encapsulated what the site was at the time.X is just a letter the current owner likes. It has absolutely no relevance to what the site does or is for.
cortesoft 2 days ago And twitter isn't? zaphar 2 days ago No, it isn't. Twitter was absolutely brilliant marketing. It perfectly encapsulated what the site was at the time.X is just a letter the current owner likes. It has absolutely no relevance to what the site does or is for.
zaphar 2 days ago No, it isn't. Twitter was absolutely brilliant marketing. It perfectly encapsulated what the site was at the time.X is just a letter the current owner likes. It has absolutely no relevance to what the site does or is for.
And twitter isn't?
No, it isn't. Twitter was absolutely brilliant marketing. It perfectly encapsulated what the site was at the time.
X is just a letter the current owner likes. It has absolutely no relevance to what the site does or is for.