← Back to context Comment by cortesoft 2 days ago And twitter isn't? 1 comment cortesoft Reply zaphar 2 days ago No, it isn't. Twitter was absolutely brilliant marketing. It perfectly encapsulated what the site was at the time.X is just a letter the current owner likes. It has absolutely no relevance to what the site does or is for.
zaphar 2 days ago No, it isn't. Twitter was absolutely brilliant marketing. It perfectly encapsulated what the site was at the time.X is just a letter the current owner likes. It has absolutely no relevance to what the site does or is for.
No, it isn't. Twitter was absolutely brilliant marketing. It perfectly encapsulated what the site was at the time.
X is just a letter the current owner likes. It has absolutely no relevance to what the site does or is for.