← Back to context Comment by elAhmo 19 hours ago No one serious uses grok. 6 comments elAhmo Reply ajdegol 19 hours ago @grok is this true? for_i_in_range 3 hours ago This comment deserves more love NamlchakKhandro 11 hours ago no RALaBarge 18 hours ago YMMV but Grok 4.1 Fast can usually find via static analysis a few things that other models dont seem to catch with the same prompt d0gsg0w00f 13 hours ago Why not? Honest question. phillipcarter 2 minutes ago Because the Grok models offer nothing different in serious contexts from the other leading models which don't come with a heaping pile of bad baggage.
ajdegol 19 hours ago @grok is this true? for_i_in_range 3 hours ago This comment deserves more love NamlchakKhandro 11 hours ago no
RALaBarge 18 hours ago YMMV but Grok 4.1 Fast can usually find via static analysis a few things that other models dont seem to catch with the same prompt
d0gsg0w00f 13 hours ago Why not? Honest question. phillipcarter 2 minutes ago Because the Grok models offer nothing different in serious contexts from the other leading models which don't come with a heaping pile of bad baggage.
phillipcarter 2 minutes ago Because the Grok models offer nothing different in serious contexts from the other leading models which don't come with a heaping pile of bad baggage.
@grok is this true?
This comment deserves more love
no
YMMV but Grok 4.1 Fast can usually find via static analysis a few things that other models dont seem to catch with the same prompt
Why not? Honest question.
Because the Grok models offer nothing different in serious contexts from the other leading models which don't come with a heaping pile of bad baggage.