Comment by cynicalpeace
17 hours ago
I'm not even proposing that growth would have been higher without "technology". I said information technology has not increased productivity growth compared to the past. This is an observation of fact.
17 hours ago
I'm not even proposing that growth would have been higher without "technology". I said information technology has not increased productivity growth compared to the past. This is an observation of fact.
> Productivity metrics were better when businesses were run on just pen and paper
This is what you said.
Again, that is a simple observation of fact. No counterfactual needed. I said it had confounding factors, and I offered hypotheses
I asked you for alternative hypotheses and you've offered none.