← Back to context

Comment by TheDong

11 hours ago

You do use the browser extension because it's a strong anti-phishing defense.

If someone links me to "rnicrosoft.com" with a perfectly cloned login page, my eyes might not notice that it's a phishing link, but my browser extension will refuse to autofill, and that will cause me to notice.

Phishing is one of the most common attacks, and also one of the easiest to fall for, so I think using the browser extension is on-net more secure even though it does increase your attack surface some.

I know proper 2fa, like webauthn/fido/yubikeys, also solves this (though totp 2fa does not), but a lot of the sites I use do not support a security key. If all my sites supported webauthn, I think avoiding the browser extension would be defensible.

Not having an account for every single damn website + only login from websites you actually entered without following a link goes a long way to avoid that.

Sure there may be existence of typosquatting here and there but they tend to be much easier to spot vs the phising url using unicode variants.