← Back to context Comment by rafram 5 days ago I think this should've been two separate blog posts. 4 comments rafram Reply chatmasta 5 days ago Yeah, it’s funny how all the comments so far are only talking about the over-engineering and scope creep, when the bulk of the blog was dedicated to a totally separate rant (but a good one!) on structural diffing. Strom 5 days ago Kind of hilarious though that it talks about scope creep and then transitions into a whole different long topic. sambaumann 5 days ago Looks like this was a newsletter by the author, not a blogpost rafram 5 days ago That makes more sense!
chatmasta 5 days ago Yeah, it’s funny how all the comments so far are only talking about the over-engineering and scope creep, when the bulk of the blog was dedicated to a totally separate rant (but a good one!) on structural diffing.
Strom 5 days ago Kind of hilarious though that it talks about scope creep and then transitions into a whole different long topic.
sambaumann 5 days ago Looks like this was a newsletter by the author, not a blogpost rafram 5 days ago That makes more sense!
Yeah, it’s funny how all the comments so far are only talking about the over-engineering and scope creep, when the bulk of the blog was dedicated to a totally separate rant (but a good one!) on structural diffing.
Kind of hilarious though that it talks about scope creep and then transitions into a whole different long topic.
Looks like this was a newsletter by the author, not a blogpost
That makes more sense!