← Back to context Comment by michaelsbradley 9 hours ago See also Final Cuthttps://github.com/gansm/finalcut 3 comments michaelsbradley Reply vintagedave 6 hours ago That looks really neat! I was surprised by the major Windows 3.x vibes. spankibalt 5 hours ago Microsoft's DOS Shell is closer to the mark. [1]1. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOS_Shell#/media/File:DOS_Shel...] rbanffy 5 hours ago I really hate that VGA looking font. That IBM went with serifs by default on the MDA and all subsequent PC fonts is a disgrace. They had a much nicer one in their mainframe and mini terminals.
vintagedave 6 hours ago That looks really neat! I was surprised by the major Windows 3.x vibes. spankibalt 5 hours ago Microsoft's DOS Shell is closer to the mark. [1]1. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOS_Shell#/media/File:DOS_Shel...] rbanffy 5 hours ago I really hate that VGA looking font. That IBM went with serifs by default on the MDA and all subsequent PC fonts is a disgrace. They had a much nicer one in their mainframe and mini terminals.
spankibalt 5 hours ago Microsoft's DOS Shell is closer to the mark. [1]1. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOS_Shell#/media/File:DOS_Shel...]
rbanffy 5 hours ago I really hate that VGA looking font. That IBM went with serifs by default on the MDA and all subsequent PC fonts is a disgrace. They had a much nicer one in their mainframe and mini terminals.
That looks really neat! I was surprised by the major Windows 3.x vibes.
Microsoft's DOS Shell is closer to the mark. [1]
1. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOS_Shell#/media/File:DOS_Shel...]
I really hate that VGA looking font. That IBM went with serifs by default on the MDA and all subsequent PC fonts is a disgrace. They had a much nicer one in their mainframe and mini terminals.