← Back to context

Comment by komali2

12 hours ago

> Copyright protected you against your work being used in ways you did not agree to.

Is this true? Remember that Harlan Ellison plagiarism case, the nightmare he went through to get a payout? It seems the vast majority of times, when a corporation decides it wants to use something you created, it gets to just do so because it has more capital than you.

Is this true?

Yes, it is.

I'm a previous career, I was a professional photographer. I spent a lot of time chasing after companies that operated with the "if it's in the internet, it must be free" mindset. The right letters, sent the right way, to the right people almost always gets things fixed.

In one example, a very major bank used one of my photos as the cover of a corporate report. That mistake paid my rent for a little over a year.

  • Most major corporations are not stupid enough to do that though, and if they do, their lawyers will tell them to just settle and the responsible person (or a scapegoat) will quietly move on. Far more likely it's some random blogger or low-rent publication grabbing stuff off the Internet.

    • They still pay.

      Like I said, the right message sent to the right person in the right way works 90% of the time.

      This comes from actual experience, not just some rando second-guesser on the internet who thinks his suppositions are truth.