Comment by ranger_danger
3 days ago
There can be other valid perspectives than your own, especially when one makes sweeping black-and-white generalizations without any evidence.
> the CEO can't take actions that intentionally hurt the company
And who gets to define what "hurt" means?
The government.
You'd have to prove that the CEO knew that it would hurt the company and still did it or that it's so ridiculously negligent that any sane person should have known.