← Back to context

Comment by lwhi

15 hours ago

Why no android app?

Why no website as well? Can't use it from a laptop, it's a bit strange for a social media, many don't like typing on a phone.

  • That's a great question, since the genesis of this was the domain name, which no one using the app will care about or visit. That is, the only thing that was actually needed here was the trademark, it appears.

  • Especially odd considering that Friendster began at a time when social media on phones was unheard of.

  • I remember when we considered a website that tells the user to download an app an anti-pattern (e.g. earlier versions of iMusic).

why not a proper Progress Web App so it can run on any device independent of app stores? it's not as though a social app needs deep OS integration. I'm sure Claude or Codex could vibe code that in an afternoon.

The main functionality to add friends is that you need to use the phones physically touching feature of iPhones. This doesn't exist in Android afaik.

The guy wants people to meet in person rather than doing social media the normie way.

Clearly targeted towards a US only audience I guess?

  • Even in the US... something like half of people have an android.

    Starting a network effect product like a social network where you exclude half the social graph seems like... quite a decision.