Comment by WalterBright
3 days ago
> Why does it require it?
The idea is that transactions then become mutually beneficial.
You cannot vote away the Law of Supply and Demand any more than you can legislate pi=3.00
3 days ago
> Why does it require it?
The idea is that transactions then become mutually beneficial.
You cannot vote away the Law of Supply and Demand any more than you can legislate pi=3.00
Who said anything about “voting away”?
It’s a strange blindspot you have where you understand there is clearly some government role to have a free market, yet can’t see that this also means the government can influence—not eliminate, you’re the one making this claim not me—supply and demand.
The government clearly has levers to influence supply, but I’m failing to make it clear it seems.
As for making transactions beneficial between two parties: Which two parties?
Why does this belief not extend to workers and businesses?
Why doesn’t the lobbying by firms to support H1Bs and off-shore prove that government policies clearly impacts labor supply?