← Back to context Comment by guluarte 19 hours ago I think MS wants OpenAI to fail so it can absorb it 14 comments guluarte Reply Oras 19 hours ago MS put 10B for 50% if I remember correctly. OpenAI is worth many multiples of that. marricks 19 hours ago > OpenAI is worth many multiples of thatvalued at --which I'd say is a reasonable distinction to make right about now Oras 18 hours ago Their revenue is 20B, so they still worth multiples of 10B regardless of valuation even if you consider the basic 5x revenue valuationhttps://www.reuters.com/business/openai-cfo-says-annualized-... 5 replies → HWR_14 19 hours ago When they put 10B in, they got weird tiered revenue shares and other rights. That has been simplified to 27% of OpenAI today. I don't know what that meant their 10B would be worth before dilution in later rounds. bmitc 19 hours ago > OpenAI is worth many multiples of that.How? senordevnyc 19 hours ago Because they recently issued shares at a price many multiples of that, and people bought them. How else would you define financial worth? 3 replies →
Oras 19 hours ago MS put 10B for 50% if I remember correctly. OpenAI is worth many multiples of that. marricks 19 hours ago > OpenAI is worth many multiples of thatvalued at --which I'd say is a reasonable distinction to make right about now Oras 18 hours ago Their revenue is 20B, so they still worth multiples of 10B regardless of valuation even if you consider the basic 5x revenue valuationhttps://www.reuters.com/business/openai-cfo-says-annualized-... 5 replies → HWR_14 19 hours ago When they put 10B in, they got weird tiered revenue shares and other rights. That has been simplified to 27% of OpenAI today. I don't know what that meant their 10B would be worth before dilution in later rounds. bmitc 19 hours ago > OpenAI is worth many multiples of that.How? senordevnyc 19 hours ago Because they recently issued shares at a price many multiples of that, and people bought them. How else would you define financial worth? 3 replies →
marricks 19 hours ago > OpenAI is worth many multiples of thatvalued at --which I'd say is a reasonable distinction to make right about now Oras 18 hours ago Their revenue is 20B, so they still worth multiples of 10B regardless of valuation even if you consider the basic 5x revenue valuationhttps://www.reuters.com/business/openai-cfo-says-annualized-... 5 replies →
Oras 18 hours ago Their revenue is 20B, so they still worth multiples of 10B regardless of valuation even if you consider the basic 5x revenue valuationhttps://www.reuters.com/business/openai-cfo-says-annualized-... 5 replies →
HWR_14 19 hours ago When they put 10B in, they got weird tiered revenue shares and other rights. That has been simplified to 27% of OpenAI today. I don't know what that meant their 10B would be worth before dilution in later rounds.
bmitc 19 hours ago > OpenAI is worth many multiples of that.How? senordevnyc 19 hours ago Because they recently issued shares at a price many multiples of that, and people bought them. How else would you define financial worth? 3 replies →
senordevnyc 19 hours ago Because they recently issued shares at a price many multiples of that, and people bought them. How else would you define financial worth? 3 replies →
MS put 10B for 50% if I remember correctly. OpenAI is worth many multiples of that.
> OpenAI is worth many multiples of that
valued at --which I'd say is a reasonable distinction to make right about now
Their revenue is 20B, so they still worth multiples of 10B regardless of valuation even if you consider the basic 5x revenue valuation
https://www.reuters.com/business/openai-cfo-says-annualized-...
5 replies →
When they put 10B in, they got weird tiered revenue shares and other rights. That has been simplified to 27% of OpenAI today. I don't know what that meant their 10B would be worth before dilution in later rounds.
> OpenAI is worth many multiples of that.
How?
Because they recently issued shares at a price many multiples of that, and people bought them. How else would you define financial worth?
3 replies →