← Back to context Comment by guluarte 4 months ago I think MS wants OpenAI to fail so it can absorb it 15 comments guluarte Reply Oras 4 months ago MS put 10B for 50% if I remember correctly. OpenAI is worth many multiples of that. marricks 4 months ago > OpenAI is worth many multiples of thatvalued at --which I'd say is a reasonable distinction to make right about now Oras 4 months ago Their revenue is 20B, so they still worth multiples of 10B regardless of valuation even if you consider the basic 5x revenue valuationhttps://www.reuters.com/business/openai-cfo-says-annualized-... 5 replies → HWR_14 4 months ago When they put 10B in, they got weird tiered revenue shares and other rights. That has been simplified to 27% of OpenAI today. I don't know what that meant their 10B would be worth before dilution in later rounds. bmitc 4 months ago > OpenAI is worth many multiples of that.How? senordevnyc 4 months ago Because they recently issued shares at a price many multiples of that, and people bought them. How else would you define financial worth? 4 replies →
Oras 4 months ago MS put 10B for 50% if I remember correctly. OpenAI is worth many multiples of that. marricks 4 months ago > OpenAI is worth many multiples of thatvalued at --which I'd say is a reasonable distinction to make right about now Oras 4 months ago Their revenue is 20B, so they still worth multiples of 10B regardless of valuation even if you consider the basic 5x revenue valuationhttps://www.reuters.com/business/openai-cfo-says-annualized-... 5 replies → HWR_14 4 months ago When they put 10B in, they got weird tiered revenue shares and other rights. That has been simplified to 27% of OpenAI today. I don't know what that meant their 10B would be worth before dilution in later rounds. bmitc 4 months ago > OpenAI is worth many multiples of that.How? senordevnyc 4 months ago Because they recently issued shares at a price many multiples of that, and people bought them. How else would you define financial worth? 4 replies →
marricks 4 months ago > OpenAI is worth many multiples of thatvalued at --which I'd say is a reasonable distinction to make right about now Oras 4 months ago Their revenue is 20B, so they still worth multiples of 10B regardless of valuation even if you consider the basic 5x revenue valuationhttps://www.reuters.com/business/openai-cfo-says-annualized-... 5 replies →
Oras 4 months ago Their revenue is 20B, so they still worth multiples of 10B regardless of valuation even if you consider the basic 5x revenue valuationhttps://www.reuters.com/business/openai-cfo-says-annualized-... 5 replies →
HWR_14 4 months ago When they put 10B in, they got weird tiered revenue shares and other rights. That has been simplified to 27% of OpenAI today. I don't know what that meant their 10B would be worth before dilution in later rounds.
bmitc 4 months ago > OpenAI is worth many multiples of that.How? senordevnyc 4 months ago Because they recently issued shares at a price many multiples of that, and people bought them. How else would you define financial worth? 4 replies →
senordevnyc 4 months ago Because they recently issued shares at a price many multiples of that, and people bought them. How else would you define financial worth? 4 replies →
MS put 10B for 50% if I remember correctly. OpenAI is worth many multiples of that.
> OpenAI is worth many multiples of that
valued at --which I'd say is a reasonable distinction to make right about now
Their revenue is 20B, so they still worth multiples of 10B regardless of valuation even if you consider the basic 5x revenue valuation
https://www.reuters.com/business/openai-cfo-says-annualized-...
5 replies →
When they put 10B in, they got weird tiered revenue shares and other rights. That has been simplified to 27% of OpenAI today. I don't know what that meant their 10B would be worth before dilution in later rounds.
> OpenAI is worth many multiples of that.
How?
Because they recently issued shares at a price many multiples of that, and people bought them. How else would you define financial worth?
4 replies →