← Back to context Comment by Fricken 14 hours ago Jack Ma is fine. If that's what you mean by ruthless then it's not really a big deal. 7 comments Fricken Reply nutjob2 14 hours ago He's fine because he complied with the authorities. Fricken 13 hours ago All states, by definition, are authorities that demand compliance. You're not saying anything that distinguishes Jack Ma's condition from anyone else's just about anywhere. nutjob2 7 hours ago That is nonsense. There is the rule of law and there is the arbitrary actions of regimes that are a law unto themselves. 1 reply → giwook 13 hours ago [dead] yakbarber 12 hours ago that's true in every country. nutjob2 7 hours ago Not at all. In non totalitarian/authoritarian countries you're fine if you stay on the right side of the law, instead of the whims of the regime.
nutjob2 14 hours ago He's fine because he complied with the authorities. Fricken 13 hours ago All states, by definition, are authorities that demand compliance. You're not saying anything that distinguishes Jack Ma's condition from anyone else's just about anywhere. nutjob2 7 hours ago That is nonsense. There is the rule of law and there is the arbitrary actions of regimes that are a law unto themselves. 1 reply → giwook 13 hours ago [dead] yakbarber 12 hours ago that's true in every country. nutjob2 7 hours ago Not at all. In non totalitarian/authoritarian countries you're fine if you stay on the right side of the law, instead of the whims of the regime.
Fricken 13 hours ago All states, by definition, are authorities that demand compliance. You're not saying anything that distinguishes Jack Ma's condition from anyone else's just about anywhere. nutjob2 7 hours ago That is nonsense. There is the rule of law and there is the arbitrary actions of regimes that are a law unto themselves. 1 reply → giwook 13 hours ago [dead]
nutjob2 7 hours ago That is nonsense. There is the rule of law and there is the arbitrary actions of regimes that are a law unto themselves. 1 reply →
yakbarber 12 hours ago that's true in every country. nutjob2 7 hours ago Not at all. In non totalitarian/authoritarian countries you're fine if you stay on the right side of the law, instead of the whims of the regime.
nutjob2 7 hours ago Not at all. In non totalitarian/authoritarian countries you're fine if you stay on the right side of the law, instead of the whims of the regime.
He's fine because he complied with the authorities.
All states, by definition, are authorities that demand compliance. You're not saying anything that distinguishes Jack Ma's condition from anyone else's just about anywhere.
That is nonsense. There is the rule of law and there is the arbitrary actions of regimes that are a law unto themselves.
1 reply →
[dead]
that's true in every country.
Not at all. In non totalitarian/authoritarian countries you're fine if you stay on the right side of the law, instead of the whims of the regime.