← Back to context Comment by Fricken 2 days ago Jack Ma is fine. If that's what you mean by ruthless then it's not really a big deal. 8 comments Fricken Reply nutjob2 2 days ago He's fine because he complied with the authorities. Fricken 2 days ago All states, by definition, are authorities that demand compliance. You're not saying anything that distinguishes Jack Ma's condition from anyone else's just about anywhere. nutjob2 2 days ago That is nonsense. There is the rule of law and there is the arbitrary actions of regimes that are a law unto themselves. 1 reply → giwook 2 days ago [dead] yakbarber 2 days ago that's true in every country. nutjob2 2 days ago Not at all. In non totalitarian/authoritarian countries you're fine if you stay on the right side of the law, instead of the whims of the regime. 1 reply →
nutjob2 2 days ago He's fine because he complied with the authorities. Fricken 2 days ago All states, by definition, are authorities that demand compliance. You're not saying anything that distinguishes Jack Ma's condition from anyone else's just about anywhere. nutjob2 2 days ago That is nonsense. There is the rule of law and there is the arbitrary actions of regimes that are a law unto themselves. 1 reply → giwook 2 days ago [dead] yakbarber 2 days ago that's true in every country. nutjob2 2 days ago Not at all. In non totalitarian/authoritarian countries you're fine if you stay on the right side of the law, instead of the whims of the regime. 1 reply →
Fricken 2 days ago All states, by definition, are authorities that demand compliance. You're not saying anything that distinguishes Jack Ma's condition from anyone else's just about anywhere. nutjob2 2 days ago That is nonsense. There is the rule of law and there is the arbitrary actions of regimes that are a law unto themselves. 1 reply → giwook 2 days ago [dead]
nutjob2 2 days ago That is nonsense. There is the rule of law and there is the arbitrary actions of regimes that are a law unto themselves. 1 reply →
yakbarber 2 days ago that's true in every country. nutjob2 2 days ago Not at all. In non totalitarian/authoritarian countries you're fine if you stay on the right side of the law, instead of the whims of the regime. 1 reply →
nutjob2 2 days ago Not at all. In non totalitarian/authoritarian countries you're fine if you stay on the right side of the law, instead of the whims of the regime. 1 reply →
He's fine because he complied with the authorities.
All states, by definition, are authorities that demand compliance. You're not saying anything that distinguishes Jack Ma's condition from anyone else's just about anywhere.
That is nonsense. There is the rule of law and there is the arbitrary actions of regimes that are a law unto themselves.
1 reply →
[dead]
that's true in every country.
Not at all. In non totalitarian/authoritarian countries you're fine if you stay on the right side of the law, instead of the whims of the regime.
1 reply →