← Back to context

Comment by xigoi

4 hours ago

In what ways is HTML produced by transpiling LaTeX more accessible that HTML produced by Typst?

The HTML generated by LaTeX is currently very good (you can read basically every paper on arXiV in HTML). The html generated by Typst just.. doesn't really work currently. I checked a few weeks ago, tables didn't output sensibly. Looking at the docs their plan doesn't seem to be to aim for total coverage in general.