← Back to context Comment by gtech1 19 hours ago GitLab ? 6 comments gtech1 Reply himata4113 3 hours ago Me and my friends call it CveLab because there was a time where there was a critical security update every week or multiple times a week. latchkey 19 hours ago The people who suggest gitlab, haven't used it. But I guess I could be tempted to try again...https://status.gitlab.com/pages/history/5b36dc6502d06804c083... capitalhilbilly 17 hours ago If you could only choose from github, gitlab and atlassan then I suppose.. But really anything newer that stays in existance has to be focused on quality from early enough to not be defined by path dependence problems and bad choices like those 3. latchkey 16 hours ago Given that github is imploding under a lot of load, everyone leaving github for something else, actually makes github better. gtech1 13 hours ago Ah, you assumed I meant SaaS GitLab. I meant the self-hosted version. I would never host our source code on a remote service. latchkey 13 hours ago Why not?
himata4113 3 hours ago Me and my friends call it CveLab because there was a time where there was a critical security update every week or multiple times a week.
latchkey 19 hours ago The people who suggest gitlab, haven't used it. But I guess I could be tempted to try again...https://status.gitlab.com/pages/history/5b36dc6502d06804c083... capitalhilbilly 17 hours ago If you could only choose from github, gitlab and atlassan then I suppose.. But really anything newer that stays in existance has to be focused on quality from early enough to not be defined by path dependence problems and bad choices like those 3. latchkey 16 hours ago Given that github is imploding under a lot of load, everyone leaving github for something else, actually makes github better. gtech1 13 hours ago Ah, you assumed I meant SaaS GitLab. I meant the self-hosted version. I would never host our source code on a remote service. latchkey 13 hours ago Why not?
capitalhilbilly 17 hours ago If you could only choose from github, gitlab and atlassan then I suppose.. But really anything newer that stays in existance has to be focused on quality from early enough to not be defined by path dependence problems and bad choices like those 3. latchkey 16 hours ago Given that github is imploding under a lot of load, everyone leaving github for something else, actually makes github better.
latchkey 16 hours ago Given that github is imploding under a lot of load, everyone leaving github for something else, actually makes github better.
gtech1 13 hours ago Ah, you assumed I meant SaaS GitLab. I meant the self-hosted version. I would never host our source code on a remote service. latchkey 13 hours ago Why not?
Me and my friends call it CveLab because there was a time where there was a critical security update every week or multiple times a week.
The people who suggest gitlab, haven't used it. But I guess I could be tempted to try again...
https://status.gitlab.com/pages/history/5b36dc6502d06804c083...
If you could only choose from github, gitlab and atlassan then I suppose.. But really anything newer that stays in existance has to be focused on quality from early enough to not be defined by path dependence problems and bad choices like those 3.
Given that github is imploding under a lot of load, everyone leaving github for something else, actually makes github better.
Ah, you assumed I meant SaaS GitLab. I meant the self-hosted version. I would never host our source code on a remote service.
Why not?