← Back to context

Comment by rishabhaiover

3 hours ago

Your argument is not meant to tackle my core claim, it is to poke pedantic holes. What a waste of my time.

The argument I and others here are making is that what you call "intelligent" is a property that also other tools exhibit which are rarely called "intelligent". You can certainly do that, but that does not prove us wrong (and also doesn't fit what most people would consider "intelligence", as fuzzy as that concept might be).