← Back to context Comment by itronitron 20 hours ago also: don't distract with unnecessary and unrelated graphics 2 comments itronitron Reply arikrahman 18 hours ago It's a bit ironic the laws of UX is presented this way with gaudy graphics that are cumbersome to scroll through. They take up a lot of screen real estate and would disrupt what the typical user is used to.I would recommend reading another headline on this forum in regards to idiomatic design: [[https://essays.johnloeber.com/p/4-bring-back-idiomatic-desig...][#4: Bring Back Idiomatic Design - by John Loeber]] anilakar 10 hours ago That site itself violates at least "similarity", "proximity" and "common region" as everything is sorted in one alphabetical list.
arikrahman 18 hours ago It's a bit ironic the laws of UX is presented this way with gaudy graphics that are cumbersome to scroll through. They take up a lot of screen real estate and would disrupt what the typical user is used to.I would recommend reading another headline on this forum in regards to idiomatic design: [[https://essays.johnloeber.com/p/4-bring-back-idiomatic-desig...][#4: Bring Back Idiomatic Design - by John Loeber]] anilakar 10 hours ago That site itself violates at least "similarity", "proximity" and "common region" as everything is sorted in one alphabetical list.
anilakar 10 hours ago That site itself violates at least "similarity", "proximity" and "common region" as everything is sorted in one alphabetical list.
It's a bit ironic the laws of UX is presented this way with gaudy graphics that are cumbersome to scroll through. They take up a lot of screen real estate and would disrupt what the typical user is used to.
I would recommend reading another headline on this forum in regards to idiomatic design: [[https://essays.johnloeber.com/p/4-bring-back-idiomatic-desig...][#4: Bring Back Idiomatic Design - by John Loeber]]
That site itself violates at least "similarity", "proximity" and "common region" as everything is sorted in one alphabetical list.